Index

Jackie

Authors List

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Jackie

Authors List

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Author/s:

A Note from the Editor Thinking is not the intellectual reproduction of what already exists… Open thinking points beyond itself. Theodor Adorno (1998, pp. 291-292) As Susan Adler notes in this issue, we’ve been hearing for some time now that we have to do school differently. But we still seem mired in traditional or outmoded school […]

Past Issues

02 Mar 2023

Volume 3, Issue 2 2014

A Note from the Editor

Thinking is not the intellectual reproduction of what already exists… Open thinking points beyond itself. Theodor Adorno (1998, pp. 291-292)

As Susan Adler notes in this issue, we’ve been hearing for some time now that we have to do school differently. But we still seem mired in traditional or outmoded school cultures, classroom practices, and ways of thinking about education and society. Sir Ken Robinson’s popular video on educational paradigms raises the notion that current systems of education remain grounded in Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution-era modes of thinking that still prioritize rationalization (classifying, categorizing, sorting, etc.), standardization, competition and consumption, hierarchical authority structures, and the supervision, monitoring and regulation of teachers and students. Robinson argues that this industrial model of education tends to lead to conformity, standardized curriculum and assessment, and an input-output model of teaching and learning. These ways of thinking and the educational structures and practices they seem to perpetuate may not help prepare young people for the 21st century, despite the best intentions of reform efforts.

Indeed, we live in a rapidly changing global society in which more information and technological solutions have done little to address persistent social, political, and economic problems, such as climate change, war, terrorism, and other forms of organized violence, or deep-rooted forms of inequality and injustice. What seems to be needed more than ever are new ways of thinking. As Grace Lee Boggs (1998) notes in Living for Change, “All over the world today we are obviously living in that in-between period of historical time when great numbers of people are aware that they cannot continue in the same old way but are immobilized because they cannot imagine an alternative.” Boggs sees this as an opportunity to look at ourselves and reorder our priorities. She believes people can develop grassroots or local strategies that have the potential to transform social practices, ways of thinking, and our sense of political and social responsibility to each other.

The articles in this issue call for new ways of thinking about educational practice and social issues. In their own way, each author suggests new ways of thinking that can transform social and educational practice. Susan Adler writes about the power of the “new old ideas” of John Dewey to help educators re-think the role of experience in learning and the need to help learners develop not just reflective thinking skills, but a “reflective attitude” characterized by being open-minded, whole-hearted, and responsible in deed and thought. Similarly, the sociologist You Yenn Teo helps us see the value of particular lenses and tools to help young people understand complex social issues as well as imagine viable alternatives. Like Adler, Teo highlights the need to see the social world and educational practice through new lenses that might open new possibilities. Diganta Das, a geographer, highlights the role particular concepts, such as liveability, occupancy urbanism, and urban informality, can play to help students better understand urban spaces. For Das, these concepts not only help students conduct fieldwork in urban settings, they also help students think more deeply about the relationships people have with their environments.

The historian, Rahil Ismail, also calls for a need to re-think and re-envision diversity through the lenses of social justice and global citizenship. For Ismail, envisioning a “new multiculturalism” must be done “in a new spirit” committed to social justice and interconnectedness that will fully affirm diversity and difference. Humanities educator Ang Hui Xia calls for the need to engage students with multiple perspectives and outlines a Structured Academic Controversy (SAC) approach that she used with her secondary students. In this activity, structures were provided to help students consider whether or not Singapore’s efforts at racial and religious harmony have been successful. From students’ responses, we are able to see that students can tackle difficult issues and analyze and discuss them in productive ways. Ron Starker and Mark Baildon highlight three teachers who are boldly re-thinking their classrooms and experimenting with classroom design. They share design ideas that might support creatively re-imagining classroom learning environments.

Taken together, these articles suggest new lenses for seeing and thinking through educational and social problems. Hopefully, they encourage readers to not only imagine alternatives, but to begin the work of enacting those alternatives.

References

Adorno, T. (1998). Education after Auschwitz: Critical models, interventions and catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press.

Boggs, G. (1998). Living for change: An autobiography. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Mark Baildon
Editor, HSSE Online

November 2014

Old Ideas Made New Again

Susan Adler (University of Missouri-Kansas City) Keywords Geography History Social Studies Junior College Secondary School Primary School Critical Thinking Teaching Dewey I started teaching long ago.

Read More »

Designing Classrooms of the Future Now!

Ron Starker (Singapore American School) Mark Baildon (National Institute of Education (Singapore)) Keywords Geography History Social Studies Junior College Secondary School Primary School Learning Environments Classroom Design

Read More »
Author/s:

Guest Editorial  Welcome to the new issue of HSSE Online! The Humanities curriculum in Singapore has, with the launch of the new History and Geography syllabi,

Past Issues

02 Mar 2023

Volume 2, Issue 2 2013

Guest Editorial 

Welcome to the new issue of HSSE Online!

The Humanities curriculum in Singapore has, with the launch of the new History and Geography syllabi, embarked on a new direction focused on inquiry in the classroom. In this issue focused on history and history education, we turn the spotlight on history as a discipline and the teaching of history in classrooms.

History is not just the study of the human past; it is the rigorous analysis and interpretation of the past. Not only does history involve investigation and inquiry, it also requires an active historical imagination to enable the historian to use all forms of evidence to better understand the past. The challenge for all historians (as well as history teachers and students) is to make historical sense out of the evidence at their disposal to explain change and continuity over time. Of course not everyone interprets evidence in the same way as aptly demonstrated by Farish Noor’s discussion of the “Colony versus Protectorate” debate. While national histories taught in schools may be the foundation upon which nation-states are built, the fact remains that history, as a discipline, remains the most politically contested discursive terrain among the humanities.

With its emphasis on perspective and context, the teaching of history in schools offers many challenges and an exciting adventure.  Moving students beyond the study of “dates and facts” into the process of inquiring into the past has become an important goal for history educators. Such work should help students consider the past from different vantage points and better understand the immense complexities of the present. History teachers are today vastly helped by the rich array of materials available for use in history classrooms, such as historical documents, photographs and even film. In this issue, Jeremy Stoddard offers a model of how film can be used in the history classroom to engage students in historical inquiry, help them learn about perspective, interpretation, and historical concepts, as well as to develop empathy. In so doing, films about history are no longer just visual cues or windows into the past, but serve as tools by which students can conduct further inquiry through raising questions and challenging pre-existing beliefs or understandings about particular historical events.

Such moves towards getting students involved in historical inquiry, however, must also take into consideration students’ preconceptions about the disciplinary nature of the subject. In his commentary on the inquiry-based approach to learning history, Suhaimi Afandi makes the case for a pedagogy that considers students’ prior ideas about history and the need for teachers to consistently engage those ideas. He argues that developing students’ disciplinary understandings about history would require teachers to pay attention to the kinds of ideas their students bring into the classroom.

The three papers that follow suggest, in their own ways, the notion of teacher agency and the influence this will have on the development of students’ understandings in history. First, Syazwani Amrun’s study about the ways her secondary school students thought about significant representations of Singapore’s past demonstrated the importance of uncovering students’ preconceptions as a means for teachers to help clarify students’ pre-existing ideas and make their learning more engaging and personal. Next, in his analytical study of past GCE ‘O’ Level History examination papers, Colin Emerson reflects on the changing scope of history assessment that accompanies the new history syllabus, and envisages the likelihood of students doing well through a teaching strategy that favors the engagement of students’ conceptual understandings. Finally, Omar Basri shares his experience in implementing the Flipped Classroom model, a technology-based instruction that serves to engage and further enhance students’ classroom learning in history.      

We hope you will find this issue of the HSSE Online useful for your research and professional learning and that some of the ideas here are helpful in developing deeper understandings about the nature of our craft.       

Ivy Maria Lim
Suhaimi Afandi
Guest Editors, HSSE Online

November 2013

Author/s:

A Note from the Editors It has almost become a cliché to claim that the humanities subjects are integral to education for young people. While

Past Issues

02 Mar 2023

Volume 3, Issue 1 2014

A Note from the Editors

It has almost become a cliché to claim that the humanities subjects are integral to education for young people. While many people pay lip service to the importance of subjects such as history, geography, and social studies, in practice, this is not been consistently reflected in the actions and choices of educators, policy makers, parents, and students in Singapore and elsewhere. Thus it is timely that this issue includes an article written by Mark Baildon reminding us of how the humanities subjects are essential for the well-being of both the individual and society. 

Anecdotal and empirical evidence suggest that teachers frequently deem these subjects to be too challenging for weaker students. As teacher educators, we have heard too many teachers proclaim that this content or these skills are too difficult for their students and make claims that their students will, for example, not be able or willing to engage in thought-provoking inquiry activities or tasks. These deficit views seem to shape the pedagogical choices of these teachers and as a result, students may be presented with a severely limited and simplified version of the curriculum. Linda McNeil calls this kind of teaching, “defensive teaching,” and this, she argues, has negative implications for the kind of education these students (who are frequently less privileged) have access to. 

We argue that it is important for all teachers to be advocates for a powerful and equitable humanities education program in schools. Teachers need to be conscious of the intent of the curriculum, be convinced of its worth in promoting the well-being of the individual and society, and to take active steps to challenge deficit views or negative stereotypes of their students.

Li-Ching Ho
Mark Baildon
Editors, HSSE Online
May 2014

Author/s:

A Note from the Editors Nation-states face numerous pressing issues such as increasing inequality, climate change, immigration, and tensions between individual rights and social harmony.

Past Issues

02 Mar 2023

Volume 2, Issue 1 2013

A Note from the Editors

Nation-states face numerous pressing issues such as increasing inequality, climate change, immigration, and tensions between individual rights and social harmony. In Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, Martha Nussbaum argues that national development goals, focusing almost exclusively on productivity and economic growth, are misguided. Not everything is about profit and development. People strive for lives of meaning, dignity, and fulfillment. People also need to be able to define their own life goals, values, and the kind of society that they want to live in. Humanities and social studies educators should, therefore, play a significant role in helping young people learn how to ask important questions about social justice, race and gender relations, quality of life, the environment, and ethical and socially responsible uses of science and technology. These questions require young people to draw on capacities fostered by the humanities – capacities for critical thinking, imagination, empathy, and justice.

Humanities and social studies education can provide spaces and tools for considering matters of individual well-being, social connectedness and cohesion, culture and values, and civic participation. It can provide opportunities for people to find meaning and satisfaction in a sense of the places they encounter (geography), their understanding of the past (history), deliberation over important social issues and policies (social studies), and in the inspiration and insights that literature offers. A good humanities and social studies education should cultivate, in students, the ability to deliberate with others over significant matters, ask important questions, understand other points of view, think independently, imaginatively, and critically, and communicate effectively. Young people need guidance in developing these capacities and the authors in this issue offer ideas and strategies that we hope will help humanities and social studies educators consider different curricular and instructional approaches that meet these goals.

In this issue, Keith Barton highlights the role of writing as a tool for learning in humanities education. By using “magic words” in their writing, students can not only improve essential communication skills but also learn about important subject matter. Similarly, James Damico’s article offers several literacy strategies that can be employed in source work to help students evaluate claims and evidence. This is a core skill in humanities and social studies education. Students must read and understand information sources and think critically about whether ideas, messages, and assertions are reasonable and supported by sufficient evidence.

Rindi Baildon notes the importance of key historical concepts for learning and understanding history. Her article outlines the ways she and her 10-11 year old students use the concept of significance to integrate language arts and social studies, help students organize their learning, and promote appreciation of the importance of key groups and individuals in their communities.

Elissa Goh and Chew Hung Chang offer different approaches to help teachers and students develop important conceptual understanding in geography. Chang’s article focuses on a framework to help teachers better understand concepts that are necessary for planning and teaching climate change while Goh’s article features a school-based action research study that found fieldwork to be crucial in helping students appreciate local environments and understand the need for environmental management.

We have also included a new section in this issue, “Critical Teacher Reflection,” to highlight teachers’ critical analyses of contexts, curriculum, classroom practice, and key issues that affect humanities and social studies education. In this issue, Brenda Ng critically analyzes a Primary 5 Social Studies chapter using a postmodern theory lens. She found that the text was written from a singular perspective and thus failed to consider the multiple perspectives that might better serve the critical thinking skills highlighted in the syllabus. Lee Seng Lee’s article considers possibilities for teaching Geography for social justice. He concludes by calling for “a more flexible curriculum supported by the Ministry of Education and for greater teacher agency and autonomy to incorporate social justice in their practice.”

We hope you will find HSSE Online to be useful for your research and teaching. We also hope that you will continue to consider the ways in which we can all help make humanities and social studies education more relevant, engaging, exciting, and powerful for young people.

As before, we invite you to share your opinions and perspectives with the other readers in the online forum and give feedback on any of the contributions in this issue. We also urge all readers to contribute articles and teaching resources so as to make this journal even more exciting and intellectually stimulating. Finally, we hope you’ll spread the word about HSSE Online to friends and colleagues! 

Mark Baildon
Li-Ching Ho
Editors, HSSE Online
April 2013

Author/s:

Welcome to the very first issue of HSSE Online! We hope that this online journal, published twice a year by the Humanities and Social Studies Education Academic Group at NIE, will be a place you visit regularly to find useful and informative articles and teaching resources.

Past Issues

02 Mar 2023

Volume 1, Issue 1 2012

A Note from the Editors

Welcome to the very first issue of HSSE Online! We hope that this online journal, published twice a year by the Humanities and Social Studies Education Academic Group at NIE, will be a place you visit regularly to find useful and informative articles and teaching resources. This journal also offers you a unique opportunity to be part of the vibrant community of humanities educators, both in Singapore and in other countries.

Humanities education is central to the development of civic-minded, engaged, and informed citizens. For this issue, we present seven exciting and thought-provoking articles written by prominent and experienced scholars and educators from Singapore, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The articles by Walter Parker, Janet Alleman, Yuen Kah Mun, Avner Segall, and Clare Brooks are largely based on their presentations and workshops conducted during the Humanities Educators Conference held in Singapore on 30-31 May 2012. They have addressed areas of special interest to Singapore humanities educators and these include inquiry learning, assessment, fieldwork, and critical thinking. We also have a special section featuring the work of two established NIE historians, Kevin Blackburn and Ang Cheng Guan. This will be particularly relevant to history teachers as the first article addresses the use of oral history while the other analyzes the communists’ perspectives of the Vietnam War.

We invite you to share your opinions and perspectives with the other readers in the online forum and give feedback on any of the contributions in this issue and on the structure or content of the journal. Finally, we also urge all readers to contribute articles and teaching resources so as to make this journal even more exciting and intellectually stimulating.

Mark Baildon
Li-Ching Ho
Editors, HSSE Online
Sept 2012

Author/s:

Professor Chang Chew Hung is working in the fields of geography, environmental and sustainability education at NIE. His expertise is in curriculum and teaching within

Professor Chang Chew Hung is working in the fields of geography, environmental and sustainability education at NIE. His expertise is in curriculum and teaching within geography education, with a focus on correcting students’ climate change misconceptions and in technology-enabled instruction. He has published widely in the areas of geography, geographical education and environmental education. Additionally, he is active in international professional organisations interested in geography, geography education and environmental education. Further, he is the Co-Editor of the highly ranked geography education journal called International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education (IRGEE). More recently, he serves as a member on the advisory board of the University College London Centre for Climate Change and Sustainability Education.

Author/s:

Dr Ivy Tan is Associate Professor at the Humanities and Social Studies Education Academic Group. Prior to joining the National Institute of Education, she was

Dr Ivy Tan is Associate Professor at the Humanities and Social Studies Education Academic Group. Prior to joining the National Institute of Education, she was a secondary school geography teacher who also headed the Humanities Department. She has done research on environmental knowledge and pro-environmental action among students in Singapore. She currently serves as an advisory member of the International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education and as the Vice-President of the Southeast Asian Geography Association.

Author/s:

Dr Tan is Associate Professor of Science Education at the Natural Sciences and Science Education academic group. She teaches courses on methods in biology education

Dr Tan is Associate Professor of Science Education at the Natural Sciences and Science Education academic group. She teaches courses on methods in biology education and integrated STEM curriculum. Her current research interests include inquiry-based science learning that is concerned about the sustainability of ecological habitats, the professional development of science teachers and STEM education in general.

Scroll to Top