HSSE Online

Index

Evangeline O. Katigbak

Authors List

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Volume 6

Authors List

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Author/s:

Evangeline O. Katigbak (National Institute of Education (Singapore)) Keywords Geography Social Studies Identity Diversity Multicultural Education Singapore Introduction Place is a core concept in geography. Geographers argue that place is a social construction (Lambert & Morgan, 2010), a product of social relations that span the globe (Massey, 1994, 2005). For Cresswell (2008), place gives us the […]

Evangeline O. Katigbak (National Institute of Education (Singapore))

Keywords
Geography
Social Studies
Identity
Diversity
Multicultural Education
Singapore

Introduction
Place is a core concept in geography. Geographers argue that place is a social construction (Lambert & Morgan, 2010), a product of social relations that span the globe (Massey, 1994, 2005). For Cresswell (2008), place gives us the ability to read and influence our understanding of various social and cultural issues. Therefore, place matters not only because it helps us frame our understanding of the world in a certain way but also because it challenges us to think about the ways we relate with each other and produce places in the process.  Given the centrality of place in geography, it is therefore important to pay attention to the ways place is (or can be) taught in classrooms not only for its own sake but more importantly, for the ways it can shape our student’s involvement in society. Lambert and Morgan (2010), for example, attend to the challenges of teaching place and suggest the evaluation of the geographical imagination that informs teaching in classrooms. Similarly, Bishop (2004) highlights the significance of place-based education and shares how local oral heritage interviews or fieldtrips to a protected wetland have taught her students a sense of community and place stewardship.

This paper aims to encourage an engagement with place by being “in-place.” I join the chorus of voices that argue for place-based education (e.g. Baldwin, Block, Cooke, Crawford, Naqvi, Ratsoy, Templeman, & Waldichuk, 2013; Bishop, 2004; Kirkby, 2014) but I extend existing arguments by suggesting that “placing” learners is particularly important in teaching about translocal and “worldly” places. Translocal[i] and worldly places are situated sites that are characterized by a social landscape that reflects transnationality. Worldly places are often found in world cities and are draped with worlding practices or “projects that attempt to establish or break established horizons or urban standards in and beyond a particular city” (Ong, 2011, p. 4). I draw on a place-based class activity that I did with my AAG10D (Singapore in Asia) students at the National Institute of Education (NIE) in Singapore in 2016 to emphasize the importance of “placing” learners, or allowing them to engage in place-based learning activities in order to help them understand the concept of place. In this activity, students were asked to work on a group-based poster project that aimed to help them interpret particular landscapes and analyze the geographies of particular places. Such an activity required students to conceive of place as fluid and contested (Massey, 1994). I discuss this class project and their implications for understanding the geographies of place in detail in the penultimate section of the paper. Before this, I elucidate the conceptualizations of place in geography; I outline this in the subsequent section. I conclude by underscoring the importance of “placing” learners in teaching place in particular and geography in general.

Author/s:
, ,

Hui Yang (Nanyang Technological University (Singapore)) Peidong Yang (National Institute of Education (Singapore)) Shaohua Zhan (Nanyang Technological University (Singapore)) Keywords Social Studies Identity Diversity Singapore By June 2016, the total population of Singapore was 5.61 million, with approximately 61% citizens, 9%  permanent residents, and 30%  non-residents (See Figure 1). Among the non-residents, 58% are Work Permit holders including […]

Hui Yang (Nanyang Technological University (Singapore))
Peidong Yang (National Institute of Education (Singapore))
Shaohua Zhan (Nanyang Technological University (Singapore))

Keywords
Social Studies
Identity
Diversity
Singapore

By June 2016, the total population of Singapore was 5.61 million, with approximately 61% citizens, 9%  permanent residents, and 30%  non-residents (See Figure 1). Among the non-residents, 58% are Work Permit holders including foreign domestic workers (FDWs). According to the United Nations’ dataset on international migrant stock (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015), in 2015, the total number of foreign-born population in Singapore was 2,543,638, or 46 % of the total population. Of the foreign-born population, 44% originated from Malaysia, and Chinese immigrants and Indian immigrants[i] took up 18% and 6% respectively (See Figure 2).

Between 1990 and 2015, Singapore’s total population increased by 82%, among which citizens expanded by 29%, permanent residents, by 371% and non-residents, by 424% (See Figure 3). The share of citizens declined from 86% in 1990 to 61% in 2015.

Author/s:

J. Spencer Clark (Kansas State University) Keywords Social Studies Junior College Secondary School Teaching Practice Student Learning Contexts Abstract This article discusses and reflects upon a problem-based inquiry project that culminated in an international videoconference between multiethnic and multi-faith secondary students from Macedonia and the United States. The videoconference provided an opportunity for students to share […]

J. Spencer Clark (Kansas State University)

Keywords
Social Studies
Junior College
Secondary School
Teaching Practice
Student Learning
Contexts

Abstract
This article discusses and reflects upon a problem-based inquiry project that culminated in an international videoconference between multiethnic and multi-faith secondary students from Macedonia and the United States. The videoconference provided an opportunity for students to share their action plans, which proposed methods of addressing local problems or issues students had identified through their inquiry. This article focuses on three ways students engaged with the project and videoconference: inquiry, audience, and public voice. These aspects of the project illustrate how the students’ positionality on their chosen problem/issue shifted as they developed skills and knowledge through their inquiry. The article concludes with a discussion of implications for future problem-based inquiry projects in secondary schools.

Introduction
Many educators and schools are concerned with preparing students for civic engagement in their communities (Bischoff, 2016). Digital media and technology have only increased opportunities for schools to enhance their students’ civic engagement locally, nationally, and globally (Levine, 2008). In this article, I will discuss and reflect upon a project that aimed to civically engage high school students both locally and globally by addressing local issues. My discussion will focus on an international videoconference between multiethnic and multi-faith students from The Republic of Macedonia and the state of Utah, in the United States (U.S.). The videoconference served as the culminating event for semester-long, problem-based inquiry projects that were developed by students in both countries. The videoconference provided an opportunity for students to share action plans they created to address the local problems identified through their inquiry. The problem-based inquiry projects allowed students to examine their positionality and develop public voice related to local issues, while the videoconference provided an audience (Levine, 2008) for the students to engage their positionality and public voice, receive comparative perspectives, and corroborate new knowledge gained from their projects.

Download Full Article

Author/s:

Johannis Auri Bin Abdul Aziz (National Institute of Education (Singapore)) Keywords Social Studies Junior College Secondary School Identity Singapore Scheduled for September, the coming presidential election is one of the most anticipated public events of 2017. While the populations of larger democratic countries have to contend with numerous regional and local elections that may cause electoral […]

Johannis Auri Bin Abdul Aziz (National Institute of Education (Singapore))

Keywords
Social Studies
Junior College
Secondary School
Identity
Singapore

Scheduled for September, the coming presidential election is one of the most anticipated public events of 2017. While the populations of larger democratic countries have to contend with numerous regional and local elections that may cause electoral fatigue, Singaporeans get to express their democratic voice only once every two to three years. This year’s election, though, is especially anticipated by the Malay community because for the first time, the presidential election will be reserved for Malays.

In an inherited Westminster parliamentary system such as ours, the Head of State usually plays a largely ceremonial role. The first four presidents after independence were appointed by Parliament and their duty was largely to play a unifying figure presiding over ceremonies and events designed to bind Singaporeans together as one people and to act as Singapore’s foremost representative to foreign states and their dignitaries. Individuals with dignity, solemnity, and a little of the common touch were the order of the day. Benjamin Sheares was a doctor, Devan Nair was a unionist and Yusof Ishak and Wee Kim Wee were both journalists.

This system was changed in January 1991, after new constitutional amendments passed by Parliament provided for the popular election of the president. The PAP government wanted to invest powers of oversight in the presidency as a check on Parliament and that called for an independent source of legitimacy direct from the people. Under these constitutional changes, the elected president was given the power to veto legislative attempts to use the national reserves, the power to appoint individuals to certain key civil service positions, and powers to oversee the enforcement of the Internal Security Act, the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act as well as the Prevention of Corruption Act by their respective executive bodies.

In November last year, constitutional provisions for the office of the president were again amended. This time the key changes were twofold. First, the 1991 requirement for private sector candidates to have helmed companies worth at least $100 million in shareholder equity was raised to $500 million. Second, the amendment provides for elections that are reserved for minority communities. A reserved election is triggered when five consecutive terms pass without a president from a particular minority community. However, these two new rules have sparked much controversy and heated debate on social media.

Download Full Article

Author/s:

Rabiah Angullia (National Institute of Education (Singapore)) Keywords Primary Social Studies Primary School Identity Diversity Multicultural Education Primary Social Studies Singapore Abstract According to Rose (2016), images display the world in particular ways through “made meanings” or representations that are socially and culturally constructed. Visual images form part of teaching resources used in classrooms and hence […]

Rabiah Angullia (National Institute of Education (Singapore))

Keywords
Primary Social Studies
Primary School
Identity
Diversity
Multicultural Education
Primary Social Studies
Singapore

Abstract
According to Rose (2016), images display the world in particular ways through “made meanings” or representations that are socially and culturally constructed. Visual images form part of teaching resources used in classrooms and hence play an important role in the construction of knowledge for children. This paper examines how cultural diversity and identity are taught in Singapore in order to understand the extent to which it fosters or hinders the understanding of the complexities of cultural diversity and identity through a curriculum critique of the reader New Girl in Town which is used within Primary Two classrooms as a teaching resource for cultural appreciation. Through semiology as critical visual methodology, this study examines how dominant ideologies of cultural diversity and identity as defined by the state are represented and reinforced through the images presented in the reader. Key findings from this study highlight the implications of representing cultural diversity and identity as static and non-complex constructions of individuals and the extent to which it hinders the understanding of cultural diversity and identity.

Introduction
This paper explores the way visuals used as part of instructional materials in the social studies curriculum embody ideologies of diversity. This perception is based on views held by key thinkers within visual culture methodologies, such as Gillian Rose who asserts that “images offer views of the world; but this rendering…is never innocent” (Rose, 2016, p. 2). According to Rose (2016), images display the world in particular ways through “made meanings” or representations that are socially and culturally constructed.

Download Full Article

Author/s:
,

Susan Adler (University of Missouri-Kansas City) Kho Ee Moi (National Institute of Education, Singapore) Keywords Primary Social Studies Primary School Primary Social Studies Abstract This paper explores the question of the nature and purpose of social studies with the aim of showing the relevance and importance of teaching the subject well. The authors argue that social studies […]

Susan Adler (University of Missouri-Kansas City)
Kho Ee Moi (National Institute of Education, Singapore)

Keywords
Primary Social Studies
Primary School
Primary Social Studies

Abstract
This paper explores the question of the nature and purpose of social studies with the aim of showing the relevance and importance of teaching the subject well. The authors argue that social studies is about citizenship education and as such, is an important subject in the school curriculum. Teachers’ orientations towards the subject, that is, the beliefs about the goals of the subject and perspectives that teachers may hold about what constitute critical knowledge, skills and values to be taught are also discussed. Some key knowledge, skills and values essential to developing young people to become informed, concerned and participative citizens are highlighted with some examples of what lessons may look like.

Introduction
The start of a new school year is approaching and Ms Tan, who teaches Primary 4 is busy preparing for the new students with whom she will be working.  Although she is starting her fifth year in the classroom, she is still excited, and a little apprehensive, when the school year begins.  Today she is rethinking some of the social studies activities she and her Primary 4 colleagues had developed in the past.  Tomorrow they will all be at the meeting, and she wants to be ready with some new ideas.  She wants the teachers, and most importantly the children, to understand how meaningful social studies can be.  Ms Tan worries that too often the other teachers will put aside social studies lessons in order to concentrate on the “more important” subjects such as Maths and English Language. “What could be more important than the study of people, how they live together and how we got to where we are today?” Ms Tan wonders.  Ms Tan believes that if our children do not understand themselves and the social and physical world in which they live, it will not really matter, in the long run, that they excel in Maths, understand scientific method or can write good essays.  She knows all these things are important, but if children do not learn how to knowledgeably participate in their communities, their nation and the world, all the rest will have no meaning.

Ms Tan is facing a dilemma familiar to many teachers – making sure there is time in the primary school curriculum to teach social studies and to teach it well.  Ms Tan’s students are very lucky.  Not only does she believe that social studies is important, but she has a clear sense of why it is important and what students ought to learn from their social studies classes in primary school.  Think back to your own experience as a student in social studies.  Do you remember the class as dull?  Did it seem to be a lot of information that really never held together or did it seem interesting?  Did your teachers sometimes drop social studies altogether in order to teach subjects considered by some to be “more important”?  Or was it exciting and engaging?  Whether social studies is exciting, interesting and challenging or dull and boring, or even ignored, depends greatly on the teacher.  Teachers who understand and appreciate the purposes and goals of social studies are more likely to find ways to make its teaching meaningful to the learners.  Understanding the goals of social studies will help you to ensure that the knowledge, skills and values that are so vital to social studies will be a part of the actual curriculum you teach, not just words in the syllabus and the textbook.  This paper will explore various ideas about the goals and purposes of teaching social studies. As you read through this paper, consider where you stand and what you believe should be the reasons for children to learn social studies.

Download Full Article

Author/s:

Kho Ee Moi (National Institute of Education, Singapore) Keywords Primary Social Studies Social Studies Introduction Most educators in democratic societies agree that developing the young to become effective citizens is of utmost importance and schools are well placed to do that (Parker, 2005; Stanley, 2010). In Singapore, Social Studies plays a primary role in citizenship education […]

Kho Ee Moi (National Institute of Education, Singapore)

Keywords
Primary Social Studies
Social Studies

Introduction
Most educators in democratic societies agree that developing the young to become effective citizens is of utmost importance and schools are well placed to do that (Parker, 2005; Stanley, 2010). In Singapore, Social Studies plays a primary role in citizenship education in school. However, citizenship education is a contentious enterprise as there is no consensus on what “citizenship” means nor about the goals and purposes of citizenship education (Ross, 2006; McCowan, 2009; Westheimer & Kahne, 2004). As pointed out by Sim (2008), the plural nature of communities in modern states, compounded by globalization and its attendant issues, has resulted in a lack of shared conceptions of citizenship even among members of the same society. McCowan (2009, p.5) posits that the “aims of citizenship education – the development of a ‘good’ or ‘effective’ or ‘empowered’ citizen – depend on fundamental understandings of the nature of the polity, the balance of liberty and equality and so forth.” The multiplicity and diverse natures of nation states in the world suggest that it is not possible to agree on one definitive form of citizenship education.

Over the years, scholars and educators have proposed various purposes and orientations to citizenship education through Social Studies. As discussed in the article “What is Social Studies?” in this issue, Barr, Barth and Shermis (1977) grouped the various approaches to citizenship education (and Social Studies) into three categories: citizenship or cultural transmission, social science, and reflective inquiry. Many other scholars have also contributed to the discussion on the goals and purposes of Social Studies and citizenship education and proposed other traditions or orientations towards Social Studies. Morisett (1977), for example, described five orientations of Social Studies:

Author/s:
,

Susan Adler (University of Missouri-Kansas City) Kho Ee Moi (National Institute of Education, Singapore) Keywords Primary Social Studies Primary Social Studies Introduction Ms. Lee began the school year by meeting with the other Primary 4 teachers to review the curriculum.  For each subject they discussed the “big ideas” they hoped their students would come to understand. Ms […]

Susan Adler (University of Missouri-Kansas City)
Kho Ee Moi (National Institute of Education, Singapore)

Keywords
Primary Social Studies
Primary Social Studies

Introduction
Ms. Lee began the school year by meeting with the other Primary 4 teachers to review the curriculum.  For each subject they discussed the “big ideas” they hoped their students would come to understand. Ms Lee likes to think about what she hopes her students will remember in the future, after they have forgotten many details. Ms Lee believes that when you have really learned something, it stays with you for life.  She also believes that her students show they understand what they have learned when they are able to explain and apply it, rather

than simply get correct answers on a test.  Ms Lee and her colleagues identify a few deep understandings for each subject they teach and then they link each unit to one or more of those understandings.  They have learned through experience that if they keep the big picture in mind as they teach, the students are more likely to make connections and develop deep understandings.

Stop and think for a moment about why you want to be a teacher.  You probably did not think, “Boy, I really want to make sure children do well in examinations,” or “I really want to help students memorize a lot of information.”  While doing well in examinations is important and memorizing information has its place, you probably had other things in mind.  Most people decide to be teachers because they like young people and they like learning.  Teachers want to help young people grow, develop and learn.  In this paper, we will help you think about what it means to learn and what the implications of that are for your thinking about what to teach.

You have probably realized that it is important to think about how to teach, but you may not have realized that you also need to think about what to teach.  Although you will be given a syllabus and told what needs to be taught during the school year, this is only the outline.  Rather than simply

trying to “cover” everything, it is important to understand the “big ideas” and identify the key skills contained in the syllabus.  If you do not make sense of what is to be taught, how can your students begin to make sense?  Let us begin by briefly thinking about what it means to really learn something and how people learn.

Author/s:

H Doreen Tan (Singapore International School (Hong Kong)) Keywords Primary Social Studies Primary School Primary Social Studies Abstract This article looks at the nature of history and how we can teach history as a discipline. It suggests several steps that teachers may want to use to teach history as an investigation as well as how to […]

H Doreen Tan (Singapore International School (Hong Kong))

Keywords
Primary Social Studies
Primary School
Primary Social Studies

Abstract
This article looks at the nature of history and how we can teach history as a discipline. It suggests several steps that teachers may want to use to teach history as an investigation as well as how to do history in the field.

Introduction
What are your memories of how you were taught history? I was born in the era, when we had history as a subject at primary level. My experience of history at the primary level was that of a story told. Sometimes the stories were interesting, if I had a teacher who was a good storyteller, sometimes not. At the lower secondary level, we underlined ‘important’ points in our textbook and at the upper secondary level, we took notes, which the teacher dictated from her notebook. For the ‘A’ levels, we referred to our textbooks, as our teachers lectured. My experience as a student of history for the first 12 years of my education is that history is a story told, of some events in the past which had nothing to do with me as all I was required to do was memorise the information taught and regurgitate it during examinations. Up to this point, History to me equaled the past as that was what I was told and I could read about the past from the textbooks which we did not question. However, the past will remain in the past unless someone records it or someone attempts to recreate it by looking at the records left behind. It was only at the university level that my experience of history changed as we examined different perspectives through different readings or sources and wrote our own accounts based on these readings. So what is history and how do we teach history?

Many of us were taught history as a body of knowledge to be memorised and forgotten after our examinations. Did you have the same experience? Or were you a product of the syllabus change in 2000 whereby you were taught content followed by source-based questions but without seeing the relationship between the two? Many history teachers when interviewed could not tell me whether history was a discipline as they were never taught the processes of historical investigation. However, they were able to articulate that science is a discipline as they had to do laboratory work when they were in school. Thus, our belief or understanding about a subject is also formed by how we were taught it in school.

Download Full Article

Author/s:

Sim Hwee Hwang (National Institute of Education, Singapore) Keywords Primary Social Studies Primary School Primary Social Studies Abstract Geography is a subject that helps children understand and appreciate the world they live in. The subject enables them to make thoughtful decisions and take responsible actions towards sustainable living. This article focuses on the teaching of geographical […]

Sim Hwee Hwang (National Institute of Education, Singapore)

Keywords
Primary Social Studies
Primary School
Primary Social Studies

Abstract
Geography is a subject that helps children understand and appreciate the world they live in. The subject enables them to make thoughtful decisions and take responsible actions towards sustainable living. This article focuses on the teaching of geographical concepts and skills in the primary social studies curriculum. Questions on what is geography, why teach geography, what are the key geographical concepts and skills in the primary social studies curriculum and how can these concepts and skills be taught will be elaborated.

What is Geography?
Geography is one of the several subjects that make up the primary social studies curriculum in Singapore. Like history, economics, sociology and political science, geography is not taught as a separate subject but is integrated with these subjects under the umbrella subject called social studies. The word “geo” means “Earth” and “graphy” means “writing” so geography is about the study of the Earth. Geography asks questions about places in order to understand where these places are as well as what makes them distinct from one another and gives them their unique place identities. It also asks questions about the interactions and relationships between places and the people living there, the impacts of these interactions and what can be done to ensure sustainable living for future generations. Such questions about places, ranging from local to global in scale, can be raised (Smeaton, 1998).

Why Teach Geography?
The purposes of studying geography (Catling & Willy, 2009) in primary social studies are many and they can contribute towards the development of children to be informed, concerned and participative citizens (MOE, 2012).

Download Full Article

Scroll to Top