Past Issues

23 Mar 2026

Volume 14, Issue 1 2026

Editorial: Contemporary Issues in Geography Education: Philosophy, Pedagogy and Practice

This issue of HSSE Online is anchored by the theme “Contemporary Issues in Geography Education: Philosophy, Pedagogy and Practice.” The collection brings together a set of articles that collectively examine how Geography education in Singapore is being shaped—and reshaped—by ongoing developments in disciplinary thinking, classroom practice, and broader socio-technological change. While the contributions differ in focus, they are united by a shared concern: how educators interpret, translate, and enact geographical knowledge in ways that remain meaningful and responsive to contemporary educational demands.

Several articles foreground the importance of interrogating the epistemological foundations of Geography as a discipline. Ryan Teo’s article highlights how teachers’ underlying assumptions about geographical knowledge influence the ways sustainability is framed and taught in the classroom . By drawing attention to the interplay between positivistic, humanistic, and critical traditions, the article reminds us that Geography education is not philosophically neutral, but shaped by competing ways of knowing. This concern is further extended in Clement Tan’s discussion of the tensions within the curriculum, where differing geographical traditions may lead to fragmented representations of sustainability. Together, these contributions underscore the need for educators to develop greater philosophical clarity and intentionality in their practice, particularly when engaging with complex and evolving concepts.

The issue also highlights how curricular intentions are mediated through teaching and learning processes. Ng Wen Xin’s exploration of the intended, enacted, and experienced curriculum provides a valuable lens for understanding how policy aspirations are translated into classroom realities. The article foregrounds the role of teachers as key mediators of curriculum, whose decisions and interpretations shape students’ learning experiences in significant ways. Complementing this perspective, Cheak Su Peng’s study on the use of thinking anchors offers a concrete example of pedagogical innovation. By demonstrating how structured scaffolds can enhance students’ responses to data response questions, the article illustrates how deliberate instructional design can strengthen disciplinary thinking and improve learning outcomes.

At the level of practice, this issue also engages with emerging challenges and opportunities facing Geography educators. Chua Yan Yu’s article on the use of artificial intelligence in Geography classrooms presents a timely examination of how new technologies are influencing teaching and learning. While AI offers clear benefits in terms of efficiency and access to information, the study raises important questions about its limitations in fostering empathy, ethical reasoning, and deeper engagement with sustainability-related issues. This contribution invites educators to critically reflect on how technological tools are integrated into practice, and to consider how they can be used in ways that support, rather than dilute, the broader aims of Geography education.

Taken together, the articles in this issue reflect the dynamic and evolving nature of Geography education. They highlight a field that is simultaneously engaging with foundational philosophical questions, refining pedagogical approaches, and responding to new and emerging challenges in practice. More importantly, they reaffirm the central role of educators as reflective practitioners who navigate these intersections—making informed decisions about what to teach, how to teach, and why it matters.

Download the entire issue

The Paradox of Progress: AI and the Challenge of Teaching Sustainability in Singapore

Abstract The rise of AI tools has transformed the educational landscape in Singapore, offering unprecedented efficiency and access to information. This study examines the integration of AI in Geography classrooms, a subject where inquiry-based learning and sustainability education form the core. Interviews with four Geography teachers revealed that while AI supports content mastery, information retrieval, […]

Abstract

The rise of AI tools has transformed the educational landscape in Singapore, offering unprecedented efficiency and access to information. This study examines the integration of AI in Geography classrooms, a subject where inquiry-based learning and sustainability education form the core. Interviews with four Geography teachers revealed that while AI supports content mastery, information retrieval, and initial ideation, it is less effective in fostering empathy, ethical reasoning, and emotional connections to sustainability topics. The reliance on AI to process data and present information as statistics can deprive students of opportunities to engage with the moral and affective dimensions of sustainability education, which are essential for fostering empathy and ethical reasoning. The findings underscore the importance of intentional, critical use of AI, guided by educators, to ensure that technological affordances complement rather than compromise learner-centered, context-rich sustainability education.

Download Full Article

 

The Effectiveness of Thinking Anchors in Enhancing Singapore Students’ Responses to Geography Data Response Questions

Abstract This article examines the impact of structured thinking anchors on Singapore students’ ability to respond effectively to data response questions (DRQs) in geography. Through a seven-week action research study using the OHLA (Overall, Highest, Lowest, Anomaly) thinking anchor with Secondary 1 Express (G3) and Normal (Academic) (G2) students in 2022, this research demonstrated significant […]

Abstract

This article examines the impact of structured thinking anchors on Singapore students’ ability to respond effectively to data response questions (DRQs) in geography. Through a seven-week action research study using the OHLA (Overall, Highest, Lowest, Anomaly) thinking anchor with Secondary 1 Express (G3) and Normal (Academic) (G2) students in 2022, this research demonstrated significant improvements in student performance and confidence levels during school-based assessments. The findings reveal that thinking anchors serve as effective scaffolding tools that reduce conceptual errors and enhance the quality and structure of student responses to skills-based geographical questions simultaneously.

Download Full Article

 

The Intended, Enacted and Experienced Curriculum: Realising Sustainability Education through Singapore Secondary Geography

Abstract This paper examines the strengths and constraints of the Singapore Secondary Geography curriculum in advancing sustainability education and suggests that current approaches to sustainability can lead to simplified representations of climate solutions, limited engagement with social and ethical trade-offs, and insufficient attention to unequal impacts across places and communities, even within student-centred classroom contexts.Drawing […]

Abstract

This paper examines the strengths and constraints of the Singapore Secondary Geography curriculum in advancing sustainability education and suggests that current approaches to sustainability can lead to simplified representations of climate solutions, limited engagement with social and ethical trade-offs, and insufficient attention to unequal impacts across places and communities, even within student-centred classroom contexts.Drawing on lesson examples, learning artefacts and student reflections, this paper illustrates how teacher curriculum-making enables the enacted curriculum to complement the intended curriculum in equipping students to think through systems, recognise contested sustainability pathways, and act as informed stewards of their environment. Through intentional task design, scaffolded inquiry and reflective dialogue, classroom enactment moves learning beyond discrete topics towards understanding the consequences and feedback loops across human and environmental systems. Sustainability is therefore approached not as arriving at a set of correct answers, but as exercising judgment through ethical
reasoning and careful considerations of trade-offs.

Download Full Article

 

A Fragmented Sustainability Education? Reconciling Geographical Philosophies for Student Learning and Practice

Abstract Geography occupies a distinctive position in educational curriculum, often being tasked with the role of educating and advancing student knowledge in sustainability. However, contrasting geographical traditions, particularly positivism and humanism, has shaped the framing of sustainability in Singapore’s secondary school geography syllabuses. A close examination of the syllabuses reveals that although sustainability exists as […]

Abstract

Geography occupies a distinctive position in educational curriculum, often being tasked with the role of educating and advancing student knowledge in sustainability. However, contrasting geographical traditions, particularly positivism and humanism, has shaped the framing of sustainability in Singapore’s secondary school geography syllabuses. A close examination of the syllabuses reveals that although sustainability exists as an overarching thematic anchor across the topics, its articulation varies according to topical demands. However, if the curriculum sets out a fragmented landscape of learning about sustainability, its ability to move student behaviours towards sustainable praxis may be limited. This essay argues that there is room for a thorough interrogation of sustainability as a concept within the Singapore secondary school geography curriculum that goes beyond how it is presented in the syllabuses. Furthermore, a more meaningful engagement with the dynamic and highly principled nature of the concept could translate into more thoughtful and practising learners.

Download Full Article

 

Teaching Sustainability through Geography: Why Teachers’ Underlying Assumptions about the Subject Matter

Author/s:

Abstract Geography education in Singapore has evolved alongside national priorities, shifting toward a concept-based curriculum centred on sustainable development. This paper argues that the effectiveness of sustainability education partly depends on teachers’ underlying philosophical assumptions about geographical knowledge. The current syllabus reflects an interplay of positivistic, humanistic and critical traditions, requiring educators to navigate multiple […]

Abstract

Geography education in Singapore has evolved alongside national priorities, shifting toward a concept-based curriculum centred on sustainable development. This paper argues that the effectiveness of sustainability education partly depends on teachers’ underlying philosophical assumptions about geographical knowledge. The current syllabus reflects an interplay of positivistic, humanistic and critical traditions, requiring educators to navigate multiple epistemologies in their teaching. In addition, it is centered around sustainable development as a core anchor for geographical knowledge. As sustainability demands understanding long-term socio-environmental consequences, teachers must intentionally align philosophy, pedagogy and assessment to model conceptual, reflective and critical thinking. Ultimately, geography’s capacity to cultivate sustainability-minded students rests on philosophically aware educators who exercise discernment in classroom practice.

Download Full Article

 

Scroll to Top