HSSE Online

Index

Syazwani Binte Amrun

Authors List

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Volume 2

Authors List

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Author/s:

Syazwani Binte Amrun (Raffles Girls’ School) Keywords History Junior College Singapore Representation Significance Concept This study was designed to explore how students in a secondary school make sense about the significance of different representations of Singapore, and to examine their ideas on what they conceived as icons of Singapore. The research was conducted in a premier […]

Syazwani Binte Amrun (Raffles Girls’ School)

Keywords
History
Junior College
Singapore Representation
Significance
Concept

This study was designed to explore how students in a secondary school make sense about the significance of different representations of Singapore, and to examine their ideas on what they conceived as icons of Singapore. The research was conducted in a premier all-girls’ school in Singapore. The data used in this study was derived from semi-structured interviews that included both a task requiring students to choose from among a set of thirty captioned images, and a set of questions designed to elicit their understanding of significant representations of Singapore. Twelve students, aged 14 to 15 years old, were interviewed in groups of either three or four per group.

The key question guiding this study was “What is the icon of Singapore today?” In order to address this question, students were expected to work with the concept of significance in history. Although the question did not specifically require students to refer to their knowledge of Singapore’s history or to have them make connections with representations of Singapore’s past, student responses may shed light on the way they think about the country’s past, and enable us to build a picture about how they perceive their identity and the country’s heritage. By identifying items they believed were iconic representations of Singapore, students’ responses appeared to reveal the kind of values they held about the country and the means by which they identified themselves as Singaporeans. The findings from this study will be useful for educators in planning programmes that would enhance our students’ understanding of specific icons and cultivate in them a deeper appreciation for Singapore.

Research Methods
Setting and Participants
This study involved interviews with twelve students from three different Year Three classes, with the age of participants ranging from 14 to 15 years old.  These students were selected to participate in this study as they had all completed one year of studying Singapore’s history in Year Two.  The decision to select Year Three students also was made with the assumption that participants would have a basic knowledge of Singapore’s history as their understanding of the milestones in Singapore’s history may affect their perception of what they conceived as iconic of Singapore. All the students involved in the study were Singapore citizens except for two who were Singapore Permanent Residents (PR). The students selected consisted of both high and average achievers within their history classes, and the selection also took into consideration the ethnic backgrounds of the participants. Students were interviewed in fours largely due to convenience as these interviews were conducted during breaks in their curriculum time. The first group of students consisted of two ethnic Chinese Singaporeans and two ethnic Indians (one of whom was a PR from India); the second group of students consisted of 4 ethnic Chinese Singaporeans; and the last group consisted of one ethnic Chinese Singaporean student and three ethnic Malay students (one of  whom was a PR from Indonesia). For more information of the participants, refer to Appendix A.

Download Full Article

Author/s:
Author/s:
Author/s:

Mark Baildon (National Institute of Education (Singapore)) Keywords History Junior College Book Review Singapore History Loh Kah Seng’s new book, Squatters into Citizens: The 1961 Bukit Ho Swee Fire and the Making of Modern Singapore (NUS & NIAS Presses, 2013) provides a highly interesting social history of urban kampongs in Singapore and the modernist public housing scheme that […]

Mark Baildon (National Institute of Education (Singapore))

Keywords
History
Junior College
Book Review
Singapore History

Loh Kah Seng’s new book, Squatters into Citizens: The 1961 Bukit Ho Swee Fire and the Making of Modern Singapore (NUS & NIAS Presses, 2013) provides a highly interesting social history of urban kampongs in Singapore and the modernist public housing scheme that transformed Singapore. Loh, currently an Assistant Professor at the Institute for East Asian Studies at Sogang University in South Korea, is also the author of Making and Unmaking the Asylum: Leprosy and Modernity in Singapore and Malaysia (2009).

Loh’s book is a well-written and accessible narrative that blends the author’s personal history (his early years in a one-room rental flat and interviews of his parents) with oral history methods, ethnography, and disaster studies. He also analyzes different “mythologies” and the ways they operate in Singapore. In his chapter on memory, myth, and identity, for instance, Loh examines the ways the Bukit Ho Swee fire is treated: from the celebratory official narrative promoted by the People’s Action Party (PAP) in various public texts to the nostalgic view of the kampong and kampong spirit, as well as the “counter-myth” of rumors and “wild talk” that circulated in Singapore about the fire. Each of these “myths” and how they work in shaping views of the past is highly relevant to history educators and anyone interested in the ways different discourses about the past, public policy, and public space work in Singapore. The book also highlights the challenges historians of Singapore often face when they are unable to gain access to public records (e.g., classified government records held by the Housing and Development Board (HDB) and the Ministry of Home Affairs).

The book also provides an alternative account and conceptual frame through which Singapore’s past and public spaces can be viewed. Noting that linear and mostly celebratory views of Singapore’s housing policy obscure the resistance and social contestation that took place, Loh demonstrates the ways  policy-makers used a language of crisis (i.e., disease, crime, disorder, social danger, communism, etc.) with scientific-rationalist visions of order and development that didn’t recognize the  agency, self-reliance, and autonomy of local communities. Loh argues that national developmental goals do not necessarily cripple local communities, even though the transitions required by new policies are often painful. Singapore’s kampong culture exhibited high aspirations, social autonomy, a blending of traditional and modern views, and a desire for development that is respectful of traditional values and cultures. Like Pankaj Mishra, in his excellent book, From the Ruins of Empire: The Intellectuals Who Remade Asia (2012), Loh points to the way traditional or more communal values and capacities can serve as a buffer against social dislocations caused by government interventions.

Download Full Article

Author/s:

Guest Editorial  Welcome to the new issue of HSSE Online! The Humanities curriculum in Singapore has, with the launch of the new History and Geography syllabi, embarked on a new direction focused on inquiry in the classroom. In this issue focused on history and history education, we turn the spotlight on history as a discipline and […]

Past Issues

02 Mar 2023

Volume 2, Issue 2 2013

Guest Editorial 

Welcome to the new issue of HSSE Online!

The Humanities curriculum in Singapore has, with the launch of the new History and Geography syllabi, embarked on a new direction focused on inquiry in the classroom. In this issue focused on history and history education, we turn the spotlight on history as a discipline and the teaching of history in classrooms.

History is not just the study of the human past; it is the rigorous analysis and interpretation of the past. Not only does history involve investigation and inquiry, it also requires an active historical imagination to enable the historian to use all forms of evidence to better understand the past. The challenge for all historians (as well as history teachers and students) is to make historical sense out of the evidence at their disposal to explain change and continuity over time. Of course not everyone interprets evidence in the same way as aptly demonstrated by Farish Noor’s discussion of the “Colony versus Protectorate” debate. While national histories taught in schools may be the foundation upon which nation-states are built, the fact remains that history, as a discipline, remains the most politically contested discursive terrain among the humanities.

With its emphasis on perspective and context, the teaching of history in schools offers many challenges and an exciting adventure.  Moving students beyond the study of “dates and facts” into the process of inquiring into the past has become an important goal for history educators. Such work should help students consider the past from different vantage points and better understand the immense complexities of the present. History teachers are today vastly helped by the rich array of materials available for use in history classrooms, such as historical documents, photographs and even film. In this issue, Jeremy Stoddard offers a model of how film can be used in the history classroom to engage students in historical inquiry, help them learn about perspective, interpretation, and historical concepts, as well as to develop empathy. In so doing, films about history are no longer just visual cues or windows into the past, but serve as tools by which students can conduct further inquiry through raising questions and challenging pre-existing beliefs or understandings about particular historical events.

Such moves towards getting students involved in historical inquiry, however, must also take into consideration students’ preconceptions about the disciplinary nature of the subject. In his commentary on the inquiry-based approach to learning history, Suhaimi Afandi makes the case for a pedagogy that considers students’ prior ideas about history and the need for teachers to consistently engage those ideas. He argues that developing students’ disciplinary understandings about history would require teachers to pay attention to the kinds of ideas their students bring into the classroom.

The three papers that follow suggest, in their own ways, the notion of teacher agency and the influence this will have on the development of students’ understandings in history. First, Syazwani Amrun’s study about the ways her secondary school students thought about significant representations of Singapore’s past demonstrated the importance of uncovering students’ preconceptions as a means for teachers to help clarify students’ pre-existing ideas and make their learning more engaging and personal. Next, in his analytical study of past GCE ‘O’ Level History examination papers, Colin Emerson reflects on the changing scope of history assessment that accompanies the new history syllabus, and envisages the likelihood of students doing well through a teaching strategy that favors the engagement of students’ conceptual understandings. Finally, Omar Basri shares his experience in implementing the Flipped Classroom model, a technology-based instruction that serves to engage and further enhance students’ classroom learning in history.      

We hope you will find this issue of the HSSE Online useful for your research and professional learning and that some of the ideas here are helpful in developing deeper understandings about the nature of our craft.       

Ivy Maria Lim
Suhaimi Afandi
Guest Editors, HSSE Online

November 2013

Author/s:

A Note from the Editors Nation-states face numerous pressing issues such as increasing inequality, climate change, immigration, and tensions between individual rights and social harmony.

Past Issues

02 Mar 2023

Volume 2, Issue 1 2013

A Note from the Editors

Nation-states face numerous pressing issues such as increasing inequality, climate change, immigration, and tensions between individual rights and social harmony. In Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, Martha Nussbaum argues that national development goals, focusing almost exclusively on productivity and economic growth, are misguided. Not everything is about profit and development. People strive for lives of meaning, dignity, and fulfillment. People also need to be able to define their own life goals, values, and the kind of society that they want to live in. Humanities and social studies educators should, therefore, play a significant role in helping young people learn how to ask important questions about social justice, race and gender relations, quality of life, the environment, and ethical and socially responsible uses of science and technology. These questions require young people to draw on capacities fostered by the humanities – capacities for critical thinking, imagination, empathy, and justice.

Humanities and social studies education can provide spaces and tools for considering matters of individual well-being, social connectedness and cohesion, culture and values, and civic participation. It can provide opportunities for people to find meaning and satisfaction in a sense of the places they encounter (geography), their understanding of the past (history), deliberation over important social issues and policies (social studies), and in the inspiration and insights that literature offers. A good humanities and social studies education should cultivate, in students, the ability to deliberate with others over significant matters, ask important questions, understand other points of view, think independently, imaginatively, and critically, and communicate effectively. Young people need guidance in developing these capacities and the authors in this issue offer ideas and strategies that we hope will help humanities and social studies educators consider different curricular and instructional approaches that meet these goals.

In this issue, Keith Barton highlights the role of writing as a tool for learning in humanities education. By using “magic words” in their writing, students can not only improve essential communication skills but also learn about important subject matter. Similarly, James Damico’s article offers several literacy strategies that can be employed in source work to help students evaluate claims and evidence. This is a core skill in humanities and social studies education. Students must read and understand information sources and think critically about whether ideas, messages, and assertions are reasonable and supported by sufficient evidence.

Rindi Baildon notes the importance of key historical concepts for learning and understanding history. Her article outlines the ways she and her 10-11 year old students use the concept of significance to integrate language arts and social studies, help students organize their learning, and promote appreciation of the importance of key groups and individuals in their communities.

Elissa Goh and Chew Hung Chang offer different approaches to help teachers and students develop important conceptual understanding in geography. Chang’s article focuses on a framework to help teachers better understand concepts that are necessary for planning and teaching climate change while Goh’s article features a school-based action research study that found fieldwork to be crucial in helping students appreciate local environments and understand the need for environmental management.

We have also included a new section in this issue, “Critical Teacher Reflection,” to highlight teachers’ critical analyses of contexts, curriculum, classroom practice, and key issues that affect humanities and social studies education. In this issue, Brenda Ng critically analyzes a Primary 5 Social Studies chapter using a postmodern theory lens. She found that the text was written from a singular perspective and thus failed to consider the multiple perspectives that might better serve the critical thinking skills highlighted in the syllabus. Lee Seng Lee’s article considers possibilities for teaching Geography for social justice. He concludes by calling for “a more flexible curriculum supported by the Ministry of Education and for greater teacher agency and autonomy to incorporate social justice in their practice.”

We hope you will find HSSE Online to be useful for your research and teaching. We also hope that you will continue to consider the ways in which we can all help make humanities and social studies education more relevant, engaging, exciting, and powerful for young people.

As before, we invite you to share your opinions and perspectives with the other readers in the online forum and give feedback on any of the contributions in this issue. We also urge all readers to contribute articles and teaching resources so as to make this journal even more exciting and intellectually stimulating. Finally, we hope you’ll spread the word about HSSE Online to friends and colleagues! 

Mark Baildon
Li-Ching Ho
Editors, HSSE Online
April 2013

Scroll to Top